CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Edmond Auger

French Jesuit

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ3047736
Source-derived summary

Edmond Auger (French: Émond Auger) (1530 – 19 January 1591), was a French Jesuit priest and confessor of Henry III of France.

Life

Born to a peasant family near Troyes, Auger entered the Society of Jesus and was personally mentored by Ignatius of Loyola. He became widely known for his sermons, which drew crowds of thousands; contemporaries such as Étienne Pasquier praised his eloquence and called him the "French Chrysostom". In 1565, Auger became provincial superior of Aquitaine; by 1568, he won the favor of the politically active Charles, Cardinal of Lorraine, who introduced him at the royal court.

Auger was the chaplain to the Papal troops at the 1569 Battles of Jarnac and Moncontour. A proponent of just war theory, he opposed the Peace of Longjumeau and subsequent Peace of Saint-Germain-en-Laye, preaching against peace with the Huguenots. In 1572, Auger gave a sermon in Bordeaux describing the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacre in Paris and Orléans as an angelic execution of divine judgement; he claimed that the judgement would continue in Bordeaux, a prediction borne out by the massacre there several days later.

In 1575, Auger became the personal confessor of Henry III, despite the opposition of Henry's mother Catherine de' Medici, who disapproved of Auger's pro-war stance and inflammatory rhetoric. Over the years that followed, Catherine became increasingly concerned by Auger's influence on the intensity of her son's devotional practices, fearing that he was prioritizing them over his duties as king.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Edmond Auger” as french Jesuit. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1530, 1591, 1565, 1568—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1530-01-01. The account is most persuasive where Edmond, Auger and French can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as french Jesuit. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3047736. VIAF identifies the subject as 51712390. The Library of Congress control number is no94035082. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1530, 1591, 1565 and 1568.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Edmond Auger”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Edmond Auger primary sources, Edmond Auger archive and Edmond research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Edmond Auger”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Edmond Auger” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.