CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Edinah Jebitok

Kenyan athletics competitor

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ64416350
Source-derived summary

Edinah Jebitok (born 10 November 2001) is a Kenyan athlete. She competed in the women's 1500 metres event at the 2020 Summer Olympics.

She won the 8 km Great Chepsaita Cross Country in 2023 and Cintia Chepngeno was second and Janeth Chepngetich was third.

In 2025 Jebitok was issued with a two-year ban backdated to October 2024 for an anti-doping rule violation relating to whereabouts failures.

Editorial summary

“Edinah Jebitok” enters the record as kenyan athletics competitor. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Edinah, Jebitok and Kenyan can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 1500, 2020, 2023—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2001-11-10. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Edinah, Jebitok and Kenyan.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Edinah Jebitok” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Edinah, Jebitok and Kenyan provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64416350. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2001, 1500, 2020 and 2023.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Edinah Jebitok”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Edinah Jebitok primary sources, Edinah Jebitok archive and Edinah research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Edinah Jebitok”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Edinah Jebitok” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.