CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila

subspecies of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 4, 2025
Entity authorityQ24688569 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila, most commonly known as the low canyon dudleya, chalky canyon dudleya or California live-forever, is a species of perennial succulent plant. It has diamond to spoon shaped leaves, sometimes coated with a fine white powder, and in May through July, bright red, orange or yellow flowers adorn the short inflorescence. A leaf succulent primarily found growing in rocky cliffs and slopes, it is endemic to California, and grows in the Transverse Ranges and South Coast Ranges, with some outlying populations. A variable plant, in some localities it is difficult to distinguish from other plants in the genus.

Description

The plant has diamond to spoon shaped leaves, with a height of 5 to 15 cm, and reddish-orange or yellow flowers.

Vegetative morphology

The stem is typically 1 to 2 cm wide, crowned by an apical rosette. The rosettes are often solitary, although some plants may have branching stems with 2-5 rosettes. Each rosette is 4 to 10 cm wide, with 10 to 25 leaves. The leaves are green, and some are glaucous or even farinose, although few are green in times of drought.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila” as subspecies of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 186-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Dudleya, cymosa and subsp can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as subspecies of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 4, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q24688569. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila primary sources, Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila archive and Dudleya research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dudleya cymosa subsp. pumila” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.