CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Ebara Corporation

Japanese manufacturing company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ5331498 ↗
Source-derived summary

Ebara Corporation is a publicly traded manufacturing company based in Tokyo, Japan which makes environmental and industrial machinery such as pumps and turbines. It is the owner of the Elliott Company in the United States and Sumoto S.r.l. in Italy. Ebara also operates through its "WaterKiosk" partnership to supply clean drinking water in Kenya.

Organization

Ebara is divided into three main divisions:

Fluid Machinery & Systems Company, which produces:

Pumps: standard and engineered pumps and pumping system engineering

Turbines: Gas and steam turbines of various sizes, including micro gas turbines

Turbo-compressors, blowers, and fans

Chillers

Precision Machinery Company which produces:

CMP, Plating, and Cleaning systems

Dry vacuum and turbo-molecular pumps

Gas scrubber systems

Ozonized water generators

Chemical filters

Environmental Engineering Company, which produces:

Water treatment and sewage and industrial wastewater systems

Solid waste processing/utilization systems

Gas treatment systems

Environmental remediation services

Plant operation & maintenance services

See also

Ariya Inokuchi

References

Further reading

"Technology. Passion. Support our Globe". Theworldfolio. 2022-04-03.

External links

Ebara official site Archived 2017-01-11 at the Wayback Machine (in English)

"Company history books (Shashi)".

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Ebara Corporation” as japanese manufacturing company. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Ebara, Corporation and Japanese.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2022, 2017—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1920-05-20. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Ebara, Corporation and Japanese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Ebara Corporation”, the useful work is to connect “japanese manufacturing company” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5331498. VIAF identifies the subject as 133740984. The Library of Congress control number is n84111128. 4 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2022 and 2017.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ebara Corporation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ebara Corporation primary sources, Ebara Corporation archive and Ebara research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ebara Corporation”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Ebara Corporation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.