Easy Projects
project management software tool suite
Easy Projects is a suite of project management software developed by Toronto-based Logic Software. As an example of web based project management software, Easy Projects is designed to enable online project management via a browser, rather than manual tracking or desktop software applications.
Platforms
Easy Projects was written in the ASP.NET programming language rather than ASP or PHP. The software runs in Windows and Mac environments. The software is normally implemented as online SaaS, or it can be implemented as a self-hosted solution.
Features
Easy Projects provides functionality common to software designed for Project Management and Collaboration including configurable Dashboards, Integrated Reporting, Message boards, issue and request tracking, statistics, email notifications, and Gantt charts. Easy Projects is rated as the "more advanced" offering in Logic Software's multi-product Project Management software portfolio.
An add-in to synchronise Outlook data with Easy Projects accounts is available.
History
Easy Projects software was developed and copyrighted by 2003 and was originally released in 2004.
Users
Known users of Easy Projects include the U.S Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Nuclear DNA and Mitochondrial DNA Units, who use the software to manage resource allocation, centralize program management, track Forensic Examiners’ spend, assign and define tasks and track the progress of individual projects.
Reviews
Easy Projects has been reviewed by publications ranging from PM Network Magazine to online venues like VentureBeat, GigaOM, Freelance Weekly and Web-Based Software.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Easy Projects” as project management software tool suite. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as project management software tool suite. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q4037886. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2003 and 2004.
Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Easy Projects”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Easy Projects primary sources, Easy Projects archive and Easy research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Easy Projects”?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Easy Projects” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.