Earl of Winchester
title in the Peerage of England
Earl of Winchester was a title that was created three times in the Peerage of England during the Middle Ages. The first was Saer de Quincy, who received the earldom in 1207/8 after his wife inherited half of the lands of the Beaumont earls of Leicester. This creation became extinct in 1265 upon the death without male heirs of Saer's son Roger de Quincy. In 1322 King Edward II created the elder Hugh le Despenser earl of Winchester. This creation lapsed after Despenser's execution in 1326.
During his exile in 1470–71 Edward IV had been the guest of a Flemish nobleman, Lewis de Bruges. After Edward's return to the throne, Lewis was rewarded with the earldom of Winchester. His son, the second Earl, returned it to the crown in 1500.
Earls of Winchester, 1st Creation (1207)
Saer de Quincy, 1st Earl of Winchester (died 1219)
Roger de Quincy, 2nd Earl of Winchester (died 1264)
Earls of Winchester, 2nd Creation (1322)
Hugh le Despenser, 1st Earl of Winchester (died 1326)
Earls of Winchester, 3rd Creation (1472)
Lewis de Bruges, 1st Earl of Winchester (1427–1492)
John de Bruges, 2nd Earl of Winchester (1458–1512), renounced peerage 1500.
See also
Marquess of Winchester
References
Chisholm, Hugh, ed.
The public source identifies “Earl of Winchester” as title in the Peerage of England. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Earl, Winchester and title.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Earl of Winchester”, the useful work is to connect “title in the Peerage of England” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1277430. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1207, 1265, 1322 and 1326.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Earl of Winchester”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Earl of Winchester primary sources, Earl of Winchester archive and Earl research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Earl of Winchester”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Earl of Winchester” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.