CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

EP400

protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 17, 2025
Entity authorityQ18044311 ↗
Source-derived summary

E1A-binding protein p400 is a protein that in humans is encoded by the EP400 gene.

Interactions

EP400 has been shown to interact with Transformation/transcription domain-associated protein, RuvB-like 1 and Myc.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “EP400” as protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around EP400, protein-coding and gene.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 30-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with EP400, protein-coding and gene providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “EP400”, the useful work is to connect “protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 17, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q18044311. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “EP400”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow EP400 primary sources, EP400 archive and EP400 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “EP400”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “EP400” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.