CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

EIF2AK3

protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ18034214
Source-derived summary

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2-alpha kinase 3, also known as protein kinase R (PKR)-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), is an enzyme that in humans is encoded by the EIF2AK3 gene.

Function

The protein encoded by this gene phosphorylates the alpha subunit of eukaryotic translation-initiation factor 2 (EIF2), leading to its inactivation, and thus to a rapid reduction of translational initiation and repression of global protein synthesis. It is a type I membrane protein located in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), where it is induced by ER stress caused by malfolded proteins. PERK also has other phosphorylation substrates and has functions in regulating mitochondrial homeostasis that are independent of its kinase activity. Because of this functional complexity, the biochemical mechanisms underlying the diverse defects observed in PERK-deficient humans and mice remain unclear.

Clinical significance

PERK (EIF2AK3) deficiency in humans and mice denoted as the Wolcott–Rallison syndrome (WRS) display a complex array of abnormalities including permanent neonatal diabetes, exocrine pancreas necrosis, postnatal growth retardation, osteopenia, skeletal dysplasia, acute liver failure, and death during infancy.

Animal studies

Based on cell culture experiments using PERK-deficient fibroblast that preceded, the initial studies of PERK-deficient mice proposed that these anomalies were all due to a dysfunction in regulating the ER stress/Unfolded protein response and uncontrolled global protein synthesis, and specifically that permanent neonatal diabetes resulted from uncontrolled ER stress and apoptotic loss of pancreatic β cells. Subsequent genetic studies utilizing tissue-specific PERK KO and tissue-targeted transgenic knockin mice did not support this explanation for the development of diabetes in PERK-deficient mice. Analysis of mice with β-cell-specific PERK deficiency found that reduced β-cell mass resulted primarily from impaired β-cell proliferation and differentiation during fetal and neonatal development rather than cell death and apoptosis. Additional studies showed that PERK-deficient β cells exhibit defects in proinsulin trafficking and secretory-pathway quality control that are not explained by uncontrolled global protein synthesis.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “EIF2AK3” as protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around EIF2AK3, protein-coding and gene.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current 310-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with EIF2AK3, protein-coding and gene providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “EIF2AK3”, the useful work is to connect “protein-coding gene in the species Homo sapiens” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q18034214. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “EIF2AK3”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow EIF2AK3 primary sources, EIF2AK3 archive and EIF2AK3 research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “EIF2AK3”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from EIF2AK3” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.