ECW One Night Stand (2006)
2006 World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view event

The 2006 ECW One Night Stand was a professional wrestling pay-per-view (PPV) event produced by World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) via. its Extreme Championship Wrestling (ECW) brand. It was the second annual One Night Stand and took place on June 11, 2006, at the Hammerstein Ballroom in the Manhattan borough of New York City, New York for a second consecutive year. The event was primarily held as a reunion show for wrestlers from the former Extreme Championship Wrestling (ECW) promotion, the assets of which WWE acquired in 2003, and featured hardcore-based matches.
Like the previous year's event, wrestlers from WWE's Raw and SmackDown! brand divisions also appeared. Just prior to the event, WWE established a third brand dubbed ECW for wrestlers of the former promotion and newer talent. It was in turn WWE's first PPV event to feature the ECW brand.
The main event was Raw's John Cena defending the WWE Championship against ECW's Rob Van Dam in the latter's Money in the Bank cash-in match, which Van Dam won by pinfall after performing a Five-Star Frog Splash following interference from Edge. The predominant match on the undercard was SmackDown's Rey Mysterio defending the World Championship against ECW's Sabu, which ended in a no contest after Sabu executed a Triple Jump DDT on Mysterio through a table on to the floor rendering both men, in kayfabe, unable to continue, with Mysterio retaining the title.
“ECW One Night Stand (2006)” enters the record as 2006 World Wrestling Entertainment pay-per-view event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Night, Stand and World can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“ECW One Night Stand (2006)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Night, Stand and World provides the most credible route into that argument.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 24, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3028718. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2006 and 2003.
Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “ECW One Night Stand (2006)”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow ECW One Night Stand (2006) primary sources, ECW One Night Stand (2006) archive and Night research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ECW One Night Stand (2006)”?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “ECW One Night Stand (2006)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.