CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

ECS Solid State Letters

peer-reviewed scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 26, 2023
Entity authorityQ18388912
Source-derived summary

ECS Solid State Letters (SSL) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal covering the field of solid state science and technology. The journal was established in 2012 and is published by the Electrochemical Society. SSL ceased publication at the end of 2015. The editor-in-chief was Dennis W. Hess (Georgia Institute of Technology). According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2014 impact factor of 1.162.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “ECS Solid State Letters” as peer-reviewed scientific journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Solid, State and Letters.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012, 2015, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2012-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Solid, State and Letters providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “ECS Solid State Letters”, the useful work is to connect “peer-reviewed scientific journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 26, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q18388912. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2012, 2015 and 2014.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “ECS Solid State Letters”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow ECS Solid State Letters primary sources, ECS Solid State Letters archive and Solid research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ECS Solid State Letters”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from ECS Solid State Letters” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.