ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology
science and technology policy

In 2011, the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) adopted a Policy on Science and Technology (ECOPOST).
An integral part of Vision 2020
ECOPOST is an essential component of the sub region's Vision 2020 Development Plan. Vision 2020 lays out a plan for better governance, faster economic and monetary unification and increased Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs). It supports the planned harmonization of investment regulations in West Africa and advises pushing the establishment of a regional investment promotion agency "with vigour." Countries are being advised to support small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), as well as to expose traditional agriculture to modern technology, entrepreneurship and innovation, in order to boost production.
A framework for national policies
ECOPOST provides a framework for member states wishing to improve or elaborate their own national policies and action plans for science, technology and innovation. Moreover, ECOPOST includes a mechanism for monitoring and evaluating the policy's implementation, an aspect often overlooked.
It does not neglect funding, rather it proposes creating a solidarity fund which would be managed by a Directorate within ECOWAS to help countries fund investment in key institutions and improve education and training; the fund would also be used to attract foreign direct investment. As of early 2015, the fund had not yet been established.
The regional policy advocates the development of a science culture in all sectors of society, including through science popularization, the dissemination of research results in local and international journals, the commercialization of research results, greater technology transfer, intellectual property protection, stronger university–industry ties and the enhancement of traditional knowledge.
ECOPOST encourages countries inter align to:
raise gross domestic expenditure on research and development (GERD) to 1% of GDP, as recommended by the African Union in 2003; in 2013, research intensity averaged 0.3% in West Africa;
define their own research priorities, so that researchers are working on topics of national interest rather than those proposed by donors;
create a national S&T fund which would allocate funds to research projects on a competitive basis;
establish science and innovation prizes;
define a harmonized regional status for researchers;
establish a national fund for local innovators which would also help them protect their intellectual property rights;
adapt university curricula to local industrial needs;
develop small research and training units in key industrial fields, such as lasers, fiber optics, biotechnology, composite materials and pharmaceuticals;
equip research laboratories, including with information and communication technologies;
establish science and technology parks and business incubators;
help companies specializing in electronics to set up business in their country and develop the use of satellites and remote sensing for telecommunications, environmental monitoring, climatology, meteorology, etc.;
develop a national capacity to manufacture computer hardware and design software;
facilitate the spread of modern information technology infrastructure to foster teaching, training and research;
incite the private sector to finance research and technology through tax incentives and related measures;
create networks between universities, research institutions and industry to promote collaboration;
foster clean, sustainable sources of energy and the development of local construction materials;
establish national and regional databases on research and development activities.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology” is science and technology policy. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through ECOWAS, Policy and Science, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “science and technology policy” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30598483. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011, 2020, 2015 and 2003.
Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.
- Current terminology
- Classification context
- Finding cited technical literature
Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology primary sources, ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology archive and ECOWAS research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology”?
- Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
- Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “ECOWAS Policy on Science and Technology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.