CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dutch conjugation

Conjugation of verbs in the Dutch language

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 20, 2026
Entity authorityQ1807487
Source-derived summary

This article explains the conjugation of verbs in Dutch by their classification, which is based on conjugational class and derivation. These classifications describe different aspects of verb structure and usage.

Classification of verbs

By conjugational class

Dutch verbs can be grouped by their conjugational class, as follows:

Weak verbs: past tense and past participle formed with a dental suffix

Weak verbs with past in -de

Weak verbs with past in -te

Strong verbs: past tense formed by changing the vowel of the stem, past participle in -en

Class 1: pattern ij-ee-ee

Class 2: pattern ie-oo-oo or ui-oo-oo

Class 3: pattern i-o-o or e-o-o

Class 4: pattern ee-a/aa-oo

Class 5: pattern ee-a/aa-ee or i-a/aa-ee

Class 6: pattern aa-oe-aa

Class 7: pattern X-ie-X (specifically, oo-ie-oo, a-ie-a, a-i-a, ou-iel-ou, aa-ie-aa or oe-ie-oe)

Other strong verbs, which do not follow any of the above patterns

Mixed verbs

Weak past tense (-de or -te), but strong past participle (-en)

Strong past tense (vowel change), but weak past participle (-d or -t)

Irregular verbs: verbs that do not clearly conjugate as any of the above

Preterite-present verbs: verbs that originally had present tense forms identical to the past of a strong verb

Weak verbs with past in -cht

Other irregular verbs

By derivation

Another way to group verbs is by the type of derivation. The following can be distinguished:

Basic: underived, compounded, or derived without prefixation

Prefixed: with an unstressed prefix

Separable: with a stressed adverbial (or rarely object-like) prefix

Most of this article shows the conjugation of basic verbs. The differences in prefixed and separable verbs are described here, and can be applied to any verb regardless of conjugation.

Prefixed verbs

Prefixed verbs are verbs whose stem begins with an unstressed prefix. The prefix is usually one of be-, ge-, her-, ont-, ver-, but others are also possible, often derived from adverbs or prepositions. Prefixed verbs are conjugated like basic verbs, except in the past participle. In the past participle, the inflectional prefix ge- is replaced by the verb's own prefix, and it is not added on. The past participle of her‧openen ("to reopen") is her‧opend (not *ge‧her‧opend), and for be‧talen ("to pay") it is be‧taald (not *ge‧be‧taald).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dutch conjugation” as conjugation of verbs in the Dutch language. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 363-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Dutch, conjugation and Conjugation can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as conjugation of verbs in the Dutch language. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 20, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1807487.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dutch conjugation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dutch conjugation primary sources, Dutch conjugation archive and Dutch research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dutch conjugation”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dutch conjugation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.