CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Cyprinodon brontotheroides

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ21366750 ↗
Source-derived summary

Cyprinodon brontotheroides, the molluscivore or durophage pupfish, is a species of ray-finned fish belonging to the family Cyprinodontidae, the killifishes. This species is endemic to San Salvador Island in the Bahamas.

Taxonomy

Cyprinodon brontotheroides was first formally described in 2013 by Christopher H. Martin and Peter C. Wainwright with its type locality given as Crescent Pond, San Salvador Island. The genus Cyprinodon is classified within the pupfish subfamily, Cyprinodontinae, belonging to the killifish family, Cyprinodontidae, which belongs to the suborder Cyprinodontoidei of the order Cyprinodontiformes.

Etymology

Cyprinodon brontotheroides belongs to the genus Cyprinodon, a name which combines Cyprinus, which means "carp" or "minnow", with "odon, meaning "tooth", in other words a carp- or cyprinid-like fish but with teeth, i.e. a toothcarp. The specific name, brontotheroides, suffixed -oides onto the name of the extinct family of Perissodactyla, the brontotheres. This is an allusion to the similarity of the protruding nasal region of this fish to the "bizarre" horn-like skull appendages of brontotheres.

Description

Cyprinodon brontotheroides is durophagous. It has a large in-lever to out-lever ratio for closing its lower jaw with force and a protruding, reinforced nasal region probably used for crushing its specialized diet of ostracods and gastropods.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Cyprinodon brontotheroides” is species of fish. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Cyprinodon, brontotheroides and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2013—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Cyprinodon, brontotheroides and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of fish” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q21366750. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2013.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Cyprinodon brontotheroides”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Cyprinodon brontotheroides primary sources, Cyprinodon brontotheroides archive and Cyprinodon research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Cyprinodon brontotheroides”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Cyprinodon brontotheroides” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.