CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Duke Dao of Qin

Ruler of the Chinese state of Qin from 491 to 477 BC

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 9, 2026
Entity authorityQ553763 ↗
Source-derived summary

Duke Dao of Qin (Chinese: 秦悼公; pinyin: Qín Dào Gōng; died 477 BC), personal name unknown, was a duke of the state of Qin during the Eastern Zhou dynasty.

Duke Dao succeeded his father Duke Hui I, who died in 492 BC, as ruler of Qin. Duke Dao reigned for 15 years and died in 477 BC. He was succeeded by his son Duke Ligong.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Duke Dao of Qin” is ruler of the Chinese state of Qin from 491 to 477 BC. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Duke, Ruler and Chinese, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 65-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The linked authority record independently contributes the date -0550. For this dossier, Duke, Ruler and Chinese is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “ruler of the Chinese state of Qin from 491 to 477 BC” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 9, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q553763. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Duke Dao of Qin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Duke Dao of Qin primary sources, Duke Dao of Qin archive and Duke research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Duke Dao of Qin”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Duke Dao of Qin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.