Dual total correlation
measure of dependence

In information theory, dual total correlation, information rate, excess entropy, or binding information is one of several known non-negative generalizations of mutual information. While total correlation is bounded by the sum entropies of the n elements, the dual total correlation is bounded by the joint-entropy of the n elements. Although well behaved, dual total correlation has received much less attention than the total correlation. A measure known as "TSE-complexity" defines a continuum between the total correlation and dual total correlation.
Definition
For a set of n random variables
{
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
}
{\displaystyle \{X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}\}}
, the dual total correlation
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
{\displaystyle D(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}
is given by
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
=
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
−
∑
i
=
1
n
H
(
X
i
∣
X
1
,
…
,
X
i
−
1
,
X
i
+
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
,
{\displaystyle D(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})=H\left(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}\right)-\sum _{i=1}^{n}H\left(X_{i}\mid X_{1},\ldots ,X_{i-1},X_{i+1},\ldots ,X_{n}\right),}
where
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
{\displaystyle H(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}
is the joint entropy of the variable set
{
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
}
{\displaystyle \{X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}\}}
and
H
(
X
i
∣
⋯
)
{\displaystyle H(X_{i}\mid \cdots )}
is the conditional entropy of variable
X
i
{\displaystyle X_{i}}
, given the rest.
Normalized
The dual total correlation normalized between [0,1] is simply the dual total correlation divided by its maximum value
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
{\displaystyle H(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}
,
N
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
=
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
.
{\displaystyle ND(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})={\frac {D(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}{H(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}}.}
Relationship with Total Correlation
Dual total correlation is non-negative and bounded above by the joint entropy
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
{\displaystyle H(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}
.
0
≤
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
≤
H
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
.
{\displaystyle 0\leq D(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})\leq H(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}).}
Secondly, Dual total correlation has a close relationship with total correlation,
C
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
{\displaystyle C(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}
, and can be written in terms of differences between the total correlation of the whole, and all subsets of size
N
−
1
{\displaystyle N-1}
:
D
(
X
)
=
(
N
−
1
)
C
(
X
)
−
∑
i
=
1
N
C
(
X
−
i
)
{\displaystyle D({\textbf {X}})=(N-1)C({\textbf {X}})-\sum _{i=1}^{N}C({\textbf {X}}^{-i})}
where
X
=
{
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
}
{\displaystyle {\textbf {X}}=\{X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}\}}
and
X
−
i
=
{
X
1
,
…
,
X
i
−
1
,
X
i
+
1
,
…
,
X
n
}
{\displaystyle {\textbf {X}}^{-i}=\{X_{1},\ldots ,X_{i-1},X_{i+1},\ldots ,X_{n}\}}
Furthermore, the total correlation and dual total correlation are related by the following bounds:
C
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
n
−
1
≤
D
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
≤
(
n
−
1
)
C
(
X
1
,
…
,
X
n
)
.
{\displaystyle {\frac {C(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})}{n-1}}\leq D(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n})\leq (n-1)\;C(X_{1},\ldots ,X_{n}).}
Finally, the difference between the total correlation and the dual total correlation defines a novel measure of higher-order information-sharing: the O-information:
Ω
(
X
)
=
C
(
X
)
−
D
(
X
)
{\displaystyle \Omega ({\textbf {X}})=C({\textbf {X}})-D({\textbf {X}})}
.
“Dual total correlation” enters the record as measure of dependence. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dual, total and correlation can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Dual total correlation” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dual, total and correlation provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Dec 14, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q5310244. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Dual total correlation”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Dual total correlation primary sources, Dual total correlation archive and Dual research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dual total correlation”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Dual total correlation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.