CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Drug and Chemical Toxicology

Scientific Journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 29, 2023
Entity authorityQ5308876 ↗
Source-derived summary

Drug and Chemical Toxicology is a bimonthly peer-reviewed medical journal that publishes full-length research papers, review articles, and short communications that encompass a broad spectrum of toxicological data surrounding risk assessment and harmful exposure. It is published by Taylor & Francis and the editor in chief is Marc A. Williams.

According to the Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2020 impact factor of 3.356.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Drug and Chemical Toxicology” as scientific Journal. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Drug, Chemical and Toxicology.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1978-01-01. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Drug, Chemical and Toxicology providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Drug and Chemical Toxicology”, the useful work is to connect “scientific Journal” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 29, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q5308876. 9 of 9 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Drug and Chemical Toxicology”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Drug and Chemical Toxicology primary sources, Drug and Chemical Toxicology archive and Drug research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Drug and Chemical Toxicology”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Drug and Chemical Toxicology” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.