CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Dracaena aubryana

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ5814062 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dracaena aubryana, the lance dracaena, is a species of flowering plant in the family Asparagaceae. It is native to west-central Tropical Africa, and it has been introduced to Hawaii. An erect shrub reaching 0.5 to 2.5 m (2 to 8 ft), it is found in the seasonally dry tropics. It is occasionally kept as an ornamental.

Editorial summary

“Dracaena aubryana” enters the record as species of plant. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dracaena, aubryana and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current 56-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dracaena, aubryana and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dracaena aubryana” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dracaena, aubryana and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5814062. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dracaena aubryana”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dracaena aubryana primary sources, Dracaena aubryana archive and Dracaena research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dracaena aubryana”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dracaena aubryana” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.