CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Double marginalization

Supply chain market situation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ1251431
Source-derived summary

In industrial economics, double marginalization occurs two firms at different levels of the supply chain possess market power and independently apply markups, resulting in a final price that is higher than it would be if the firms were integrated. Double marginalization is clearly negative from an economic welfare point of view, as the double markup leads to a final price is higher than the price that would maximize the firms' joint profit, lowering both producer and consumer surpluses. The situation arises from externalities: each firm does not fully take into account the impact of its pricing on the other firm.

Example

Consider an industry with an upstream manufacturer and a downstream retailer. The manufacturer does not sell directly to consumers, but through the retailer. Suppose that the consumer demand for the product is given by the function

Q

=

10

p

{\displaystyle \mathrm {Q} =10-p}

where

p

{\displaystyle p}

is the final consumer price, the manufacturer has a constant marginal cost of

c

=

2

{\displaystyle c=2}

, while the retailer does not incur any costs, other than the wholesale price paid to the manufacturer.

In the case that a single monopolist controls both the upstream and downstream operation, the price that would maximize its total profit

Π

=

(

p

2

)

(

10

p

)

{\displaystyle \Pi =(p-2)(10-p)}

is

p

=

6

{\displaystyle p=6}

, resulting in a quantity of

Q

=

4

{\displaystyle \mathrm {Q} =4}

and a total profit of 16.

In a non-integrated scenario, the monopolist manufacturer sets the wholesale price

w

{\displaystyle w}

, then retailer observes the retail price and sets the final price

p

{\displaystyle p}

. Given the wholesale price

w

{\displaystyle w}

, the retailer's profit is given by

(

p

w

)

(

10

p

)

{\displaystyle (p-w)(10-p)}

. Thus, its profit-maximizing price is

p

=

5

+

0.5

w

{\displaystyle p=5+0.5w}

, corresponding to the quantity of

Q

=

10

(

5

0.5

w

)

=

5

0.5

w

{\displaystyle Q=10-(5-0.5w)=5-0.5w}

.

Editorial summary

“Double marginalization” enters the record as supply chain market situation. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Double, marginalization and Supply can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 342-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Double, marginalization and Supply.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Double marginalization” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Double, marginalization and Supply provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1251431. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Double marginalization”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Double marginalization primary sources, Double marginalization archive and Double research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Double marginalization”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Double marginalization” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.