Double Tables
1995 Extreme Championship Wrestling supercard event
Double Tables was a professional wrestling supercard event produced by Extreme Championship Wrestling (ECW). It took place on February 4, 1995, from the ECW Arena in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. The commentator for the event was Joey Styles.
The event was a part of an Internet wrestling convention being held in the area and was named after the show's main event. Several of the bouts were broadcast on the February 7, February 14 and February 21 episodes of ECW Hardcore TV.
Chris Benoit versus Al Snow was included on the 2004 WWE DVD release Hard Knocks: The Chris Benoit Story.
Background
Double Tables featured professional wrestling matches that involved different wrestlers from pre-existing scripted feuds and storylines. Wrestlers portrayed villains, heroes, or less distinguishable characters in the scripted events that built tension and culminated in a wrestling match or series of matches.
The Pitbulls had been on a roll since breaking up The Bad Breed.
Tommy Dreamer ended the winning streak of Stevie Richards, who had adopted the many identities of Scott Levy, before heading off for a tour with All Japan. Richards then brought Levy himself to ECW but now he was known simply as Raven, a man with a grudge against Dreamer and was now instilling the same hatred into Richards.
“Double Tables” enters the record as 1995 Extreme Championship Wrestling supercard event. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Double, Tables and Extreme can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Double Tables” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Double, Tables and Extreme provides the most credible route into that argument.
Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5299891. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1995 and 2004.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Double Tables”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Double Tables primary sources, Double Tables archive and Double research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Double Tables”?
- Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Double Tables” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.