CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Double Supports

Chinese Communist Party campaign

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ48916222
Source-derived summary

Double Supports or Double Support (Chinese: 双拥), also Supporting the Military, Giving Preferential Treatment to Military Families; Supporting the Government and Loving the People (Chinese: 拥军优属拥政爱民), is a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) campaign with the aim of strengthening unity between the military and the government, as well as between the military and the people. It was institutionalized in 1991 with the creation of the National Leading Group for Double Supports.

History

Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army period

As early as the formative period of the Chinese Workers' and Peasants' Red Army, the Chinese Communist Party and Mao Zedong advanced the idea that the Red Army could not exist without the support of workers and peasants. They required the armed forces to care for the people, while the governments and populations of the revolutionary base areas were to support the Red Army and provide preferential treatment to military families.

Second Sino-Japanese War period

During the Second Sino-Japanese War, in order to consolidate and develop the anti-Japanese base areas and expand the Second United Front, the government of the Shaan–Gan–Ning Border Region launched activities to “support the army and give preferential treatment to families of anti-Japanese soldiers,” while the Rear Garrison Corps of the Eighth Route Army carried out activities to “support the government and love the people.” In January 1943, Mao Zedong affirmed the practices of the Shaan–Gan–Ning Border Region and called on all anti-Japanese base areas to generally carry out these activities.

The background to these developments lay in the harsh climate, barren land, and underdeveloped economy of the Shaan–Gan–Ning Border Region. In September 1939, amid friction between the Kuomintang and the CCP, the Kuomintang government halted the already limited military pay and supplies for troops stationed in the region. In 1939, the region had a population of more than 2 million, with over 40,000 full-time nonproductive personnel; by 1941, the population had fallen to about 1.4 million, while nonproductive personnel increased to nearly 80,000. As the nonproductive population grew, the border-region government imposed increasing levies of “National Salvation Public Grain” (救国公粮) year after year.

On 1 August 1937, the Shaan–Gan–Ning Border Region Party Committee issued the “Decision on the Collection of National Salvation Public Grain,” requiring the collection of 15,000 shi of grain that year.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Double Supports” as chinese Communist Party campaign. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Double, Supports and Chinese.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1991, 1943, 1939, 1941—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Double, Supports and Chinese providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Double Supports”, the useful work is to connect “chinese Communist Party campaign” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q48916222. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1991, 1943, 1939 and 1941.

Critical limits

Institutional narratives can privilege the records that survived while minimizing voices that were never formally collected. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Double Supports”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Double Supports primary sources, Double Supports archive and Double research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Double Supports”?
  2. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
  3. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Double Supports” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.