CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Chlorocoma dichloraria

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ5103039 ↗
Source-derived summary

Chlorocoma dichloraria, the double-fringed emerald or Guenée's emerald, is a species of moth of the family Geometridae first described by Achille Guenée in 1858. It is found in the Australian states of New South Wales, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania, Victoria and Western Australia.

The wingspan is about 30 mm.

The larvae feed on various Mimosaceae species.

External links

Herbison-Evans, Don & Crossley, Stella (7 February 2019). "Chlorocoma dichloraria (Guenée, 1857) Double-fringed or Guenée's Emerald". Australian Caterpillars and their Butterflies and Moths. Retrieved 19 April 2019.

Editorial summary

“Chlorocoma dichloraria” enters the record as species of insect. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Chlorocoma, dichloraria and species can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1858, 2019, 1857—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Chlorocoma, dichloraria and species.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Chlorocoma dichloraria” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Chlorocoma, dichloraria and species provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5103039. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1858, 2019 and 1857.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Chlorocoma dichloraria”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Chlorocoma dichloraria primary sources, Chlorocoma dichloraria archive and Chlorocoma research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Chlorocoma dichloraria”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Chlorocoma dichloraria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.