CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Doris Dlakude

South African politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 29, 2026
Entity authorityQ47529844
Source-derived summary

Doris Eunice Mpapane (born 16 August 1969), sometimes also spelled Dorris or Dorries, is a South African politician from Mpumalanga. She is the Deputy Chief Whip of the Majority Party in the National Assembly. She was appointed to that position in June 2013, representing the African National Congress, and she has been a Member of Parliament since February 2010.

Early life and education

Born on 16 August 1969, Mpapane matriculated at Mjokwane Senior Secondary School in Komatipoort in the former Eastern Transvaal. She has an Honours degree in governance and leadership from the University of the Witwatersrand.

Early political career

Mpapane held a variety of positions in her political party, the African National Congress (ANC); she was regional treasurer of the ANC Youth League in Ehlanzeni, was on the Provincial Executive Committee of the ANC and ANC Women's League in Mpumalanga, and spent six terms as the secretary of her local ANC branch. She joined the National Assembly on 9 February 2010, filling the casual vacancy caused by Nomatyala Hangana's resignation.

Deputy Chief Whip: 2013–present

On 20 June 2013, the ANC announced that Mpapane would take office as Deputy Chief Whip of the Majority Party; she deputised Stone Sizani, who was also newly appointed, and replaced Mmamoloko Kubayi, who had been acting in the position. Both Sizani and Mpapane were reappointed after the 2014 general election, but Sizani resigned on 2 March 2016; Mpapane subsequently acted as Chief Whip until Jackson Mthembu was appointed to the position three weeks later.

During this period, Mpapane was on the ad hoc parliamentary committee established to respond to Nkandlagate.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Doris Dlakude” as south African politician. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Doris, Dlakude and South.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1969, 2013, 2010, 2014—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Doris, Dlakude and South providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Doris Dlakude”, the useful work is to connect “south African politician” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 29, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q47529844. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1969, 2013, 2010 and 2014.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Doris Dlakude”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Doris Dlakude primary sources, Doris Dlakude archive and Doris research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Doris Dlakude”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Doris Dlakude” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.