CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Donzy-le-Pertuis

commune in Saône-et-Loire, France

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 25, 2024
Entity authorityQ1174402 ↗
Source-derived summary

Donzy-le-Pertuis (French pronunciation: [dɔ̃zi lə pɛʁtɥi]) is a commune in the Saône-et-Loire department in the region of Bourgogne-Franche-Comté in eastern France.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Donzy-le-Pertuis” as commune in Saône-et-Loire, France. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Donzy-le-Pertuis, commune and Saône-et-Loire.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 21-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Donzy-le-Pertuis, commune and Saône-et-Loire providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Donzy-le-Pertuis”, the useful work is to connect “commune in Saône-et-Loire, France” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 25, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q1174402. VIAF identifies the subject as 126795050. The Library of Congress control number is n89660306. Authority coordinates are 46.451, 4.721. 2 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Donzy-le-Pertuis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Donzy-le-Pertuis primary sources, Donzy-le-Pertuis archive and Donzy-le-Pertuis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Donzy-le-Pertuis”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Donzy-le-Pertuis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.