CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Kang Dong-jin

South Korean professional racing cyclist

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ19518359 ↗
Source-derived summary

Kang Dong-jin (Korean: 강동진, Korean pronunciation: [kaŋ.doŋ.dʑin] or [kaŋ] [toŋ.dʑin]; born 23 December 1987) is a South Korean professional racing cyclist. He rode at the 2015 UCI Track Cycling World Championships. He competed at the 2006 and 2014 Asian Games.

In 2010 he was suspended for two years after he failed a drug test for methyltestosterone doping.

Editorial summary

“Kang Dong-jin” enters the record as south Korean professional racing cyclist. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Kang, Dong-jin and South can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1987, 2015, 2006, 2014—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1987-12-23. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Kang, Dong-jin and South.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Kang Dong-jin” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Kang, Dong-jin and South provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q19518359. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1987, 2015, 2006 and 2014.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Kang Dong-jin”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Kang Dong-jin primary sources, Kang Dong-jin archive and Kang research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Kang Dong-jin”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Kang Dong-jin” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.