CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Dominic Sandbrook

British historian

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ5290642
Source-derived summary

Dominic Christopher Sandbrook (born 2 October 1974) is a British historian, author, columnist, podcaster, and television presenter. He has written many popular history books as well as articles in newspapers, presented history shows on BBC Television and Radio, and since 2020 co-hosts The Rest is History podcast with the historian and author Tom Holland.

Early life and education

Dominic Christopher Sandbrook was born in October 1974 in Bridgnorth, Shropshire. He was educated at Malvern College, then an all-boys independent school in Worcestershire.

He studied history and French at Balliol College, Oxford. He then studied for a Master of Letters (MLitt) degree in history at the University of St Andrews and a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) degree at Jesus College, Cambridge. His doctoral thesis, "The political career of Senator Eugene McCarthy", was completed in 2002.

Academia

Previously a lecturer in history at the University of Sheffield, Sandbrook has been a senior fellow of the Rothermere American Institute at the University of Oxford and a member of its history faculty. He was a visiting professor at King's College London, and a freelance writer and newspaper columnist. In 2007 he was named one of Waterstones' 25 Authors for the Future.

Editorial summary

“Dominic Sandbrook” enters the record as british historian. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dominic, Sandbrook and British can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1974, 2020, 2002, 2007—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1974-10-02. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dominic, Sandbrook and British.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dominic Sandbrook” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dominic, Sandbrook and British provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5290642. VIAF identifies the subject as 85297922. The Library of Congress control number is n2003028397. 3 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1974, 2020, 2002 and 2007.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dominic Sandbrook”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dominic Sandbrook primary sources, Dominic Sandbrook archive and Dominic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dominic Sandbrook”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dominic Sandbrook” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.