CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Domain (game)

abstract strategy game

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ119681620
Source-derived summary

Domain (also known as Boomerang, Chameleon, Kiss, or 2001: the space age game) is a tile-based abstract strategy game first published throughout Europe in 1982. Players place multicoloured polyomino tiles on a game board and flip any of their opponent's pieces adjacent to them in order to have the most squares covered by their colour at the end of the game.

Publication history

Domain was first marketed around Europe in 1982 under various names. It was published in France by Nathan as Boomerang, in Britain by Waddingtons as Chameleon, in Italy by Editrice Giochi as Kiss, and in Sweden by Alga as 2001: the space age game, although it is unknown who designed it.

In 1983, the game was published in North America by Parkers Brothers, with the name Domain and the slogan “Where the Challenge is...”.

Gameplay

Domain is played on a 9x9 game board using 26 polyomino tiles, which are each one of eight different shapes labelled from 2 to 5 corresponding to its number of squares. In Domain, the pieces are white on one side and blue on the other, although the two colours differ depending on the edition.

Both players are assigned colours and take turns placing one tile with their colour face-up onto the game board. Any pieces of their opponent's colour which are non-diagonally adjacent to the placed piece are flipped. Play continues back and forth until no more pieces can be played.

Editorial summary

“Domain (game)” enters the record as abstract strategy game. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Domain, game and abstract can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2001, 1982, 1983—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Domain, game and abstract.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Domain (game)” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Domain, game and abstract provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q119681620. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2001, 1982 and 1983.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Domain (game)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Domain (game) primary sources, Domain (game) archive and Domain research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Domain (game)”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Domain (game)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.