CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dochmiac

metrical foot

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 29, 2024
Entity authorityQ642214
Source-derived summary

Dochmiac (Ancient Greek: δοχμιακός, from δόχμιος 'across, aslant, oblique', or 'pertaining to a δοχμή or hand's-breath') is a poetic meter that is characteristically used in Greek tragedy, expressing extreme agitation or distress. They appear in every extant tragedy—N.C. Conomis counted a total of 1,985 in the tragedies of Aeschylus (528×), Sophocles (291×), and Euripides (1166×)—, but there are also examples in satyric drama and Aristophanes, where they are often paratragic in tone and impassioned.

Metrical scheme

The base metrical scheme is: ‿ — — ‿ —, although any of the long syllables may be resolved (i.e., replaced by two shorts) and either of the two shorts may be replaced by a long (drag-in where the first is replaced, drag-out where the second is replaced, and double drag where both are replaced). Thus, in theory, 32 variants are possible, ranging from five longs — — — — — to eight shorts, ‿ ‿‿ ‿‿ ‿ ‿‿. The ones occurring most often are

‿ — — ‿ —,

‿ ‿‿ — ‿ —, and

— ‿‿ — ‿ —.

Examples

Here is an example from Aeschylus' Seven against Thebes, lines 697-700, where the chorus in vain tries to withhold Oedipus' son Eteocles from a fatal battle with his brother Polynices. The first three lines here are pairs of — ‿‿ — ‿ — dochmiacs. Long syllables have been underlined. (The fourth line is a hagesichorean.) Note that dochmiacs and even whole lines can start and end in the middle of a word:

ἀλλὰ σὺ μὴ ʼποτρύνου· κακὸς οὐ κεκλή-

σῃ βίον εὖ κυρήσας· μελάναιγις δʼ· οὐκ

εἶσι δόμων Ἐρινύς, ὅταν ἐκ χερῶν

θεοὶ θυσίαν δέχωνται;

allà sù mḕ ’potrú/nou; kakòs ou keklḗ-

sēi bíon eû kurḗ/sas; melánaigis d’ ouk

eîsi dómōn Eri/nús, hótan ek kherôn

theoì thusían dékhōntai?

| – u u – u – | – u u – u – |

| – u u – u – | – u u – – – |

| – u u – u – | – u u – u – |

| u – – u – | u – – ||

No, don't you be excited; you won't be called a coward,

since you have prospered in life; but will not the black-shielded

Erinys (Avenging Spirit) leave your house, when from your hands

the gods will receive a sacrificial offering?

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dochmiac” as metrical foot. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1166—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Dochmiac, metrical and foot can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as metrical foot. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 29, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q642214. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1166.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dochmiac”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dochmiac primary sources, Dochmiac archive and Dochmiac research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dochmiac”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dochmiac” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.