CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Documenta Mathematica

journal

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ15222691
Source-derived summary

Documenta Mathematica is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary mathematical journal by the German Mathematical Society published since 1996. The journal doesn't charge a publishing fee from authors, and all publications are available online free-of-charge as PDF files, making it completely open-access to both authors and readers. Since September 2017, articles are published under the Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 license.

The current editorial board includes Henning Krause, Stefan Teufel and Otmar Venjakob. Since 1996 until 2017, Documenta Mathematica had been being published by Bielefeld University, since 2018 until 2022 by FIZ Karlsruhe, and at present by EMS Press. It's published as one 6-issue volume annually with approximately 60 articles vetted by reviewers. The publication related to the journal is the Documenta Mathematica Series (formerly known as Documenta Mathematica Extra Volumes), a book series which publishes edited volumes and monographs.

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is indexed and abstracted in the following bibliographic databases:

Both JUFO considers the journal to be a Level 2 journal, considered 'leading' in its field. Likewise, the Norwegian Scientific Index considers the journal to be a Level 2 journal, its highest rating reserved for the top 20% of journals.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Documenta Mathematica” is journal. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Documenta, Mathematica and journal, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1996, 2017, 2018, 2022—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Documenta, Mathematica and journal is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “journal” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q15222691. 1 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1996, 2017, 2018 and 2022.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Documenta Mathematica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Documenta Mathematica primary sources, Documenta Mathematica archive and Documenta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Documenta Mathematica”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Documenta Mathematica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.