CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Dnyaneshwar Patil

Indian politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ22279596 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dnyaneshwar Raosaheb Patil (died 2 October 2024) was a Shiv Sena politician from Osmanabad district. He was Member of the Legislative Assembly from Paranda (Vidhan Sabha constituency) of Osmanabad District, Maharashtra, India as a member of Shiv Sena. He has been elected consecutively for two terms in the Maharashtra Legislative Assembly for 1995 and 1999.

Patil died on 2 October 2024.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Dnyaneshwar Patil” as indian politician. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2024, 1995, 1999—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Dnyaneshwar, Patil and Indian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the people & ideas register because the source frames it as indian politician. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22279596. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2024, 1995 and 1999.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dnyaneshwar Patil”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dnyaneshwar Patil primary sources, Dnyaneshwar Patil archive and Dnyaneshwar research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dnyaneshwar Patil”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dnyaneshwar Patil” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.