CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Dzmitry Chaley

Belarusian footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 28, 2024
Entity authorityQ5319990
Source-derived summary

Dzmitry Alyaksandrovich Chaley (Belarusian: Дзьмітры Аляксандровіч Чалей; Russian: Дмитрий Александрович Чалей; born 14 February 1978) is a retired Belarusian professional footballer. After retiring, he worked as a youth coach.

Career

In 2001, Chaley left Slavia Mozyr for Ružomberok in Slovakia. In 2004, he said that "What caught my eye [in Slovakia] was the abundance of tough game - the fight on the field was conducted until the last second of the match. To master after the “Slavia”, where they practiced technical, combination football, was not easy. In principle, the level of the Slovak championship is low.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Dzmitry Chaley” is belarusian footballer. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Dzmitry, Chaley and Belarusian, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1978, 2001, 2004—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1978-02-14. For this dossier, Dzmitry, Chaley and Belarusian is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “belarusian footballer” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 28, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5319990. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1978, 2001 and 2004.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dzmitry Chaley”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dzmitry Chaley primary sources, Dzmitry Chaley archive and Dzmitry research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dzmitry Chaley”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dzmitry Chaley” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.