CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

District Photo

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ22059440 ↗
Source-derived summary

District Photo is a digital imaging services company headquartered in Beltsville, Maryland, United States. The company started in 1949 as a black-and-white photograph developing laboratory. It now serves large retail chains that offer photo development services, such as Costco and Walgreens, and has a national mail order film business.

Editorial summary

“District Photo” enters the record as open-knowledge reference entry. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what District, Photo and Open-knowledge can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1949—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1949. Its strongest next move is a source search built around District, Photo and Open-knowledge.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“District Photo” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, District, Photo and Open-knowledge provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q22059440. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1949.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “District Photo”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow District Photo primary sources, District Photo archive and District research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “District Photo”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “District Photo” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.