CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Disjecta (book)

play by Samuel Beckett

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ5282256 ↗
Source-derived summary

Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment (John Calder, 1983) is a collection of previously uncollected writings by Samuel Beckett, spanning his entire career. The title is derived from the Latin phrase "disjecta membra", meaning scattered remains or fragments, usually applied to written work.

The essays appear in their original language of composition (English, French, or German), as stipulated by Beckett, since the volume is intended for scholars who should be able to read several languages. Beckett himself did not value these pieces much, seeing them as "mere products of friendly obligation or economic need".

The collection includes Beckett's famous essay on an early version of James Joyce's Finnegans Wake which originally appeared in Our Exagmination Round His Factification for Incamination of Work in Progress.

Contents

Foreword by Ruby Cohn

Part I: Essays at Esthetics

Dante...Bruno.Vico..Joyce – essay on Finnegans Wake

Le Concentrisme – an account of an imaginary poet and the movement supposedly founded by him (French)

Excerpts from Dream of Fair to Middling Women

German Letter of 1937 (German)

Les Deux Besoins (French)

Part II: Words about Writers

Other Writers

Mörike on Mozart

Feuillerat on Proust

Leishmann's Rilke translation

Thomas MacGreevy

Recent Irish poetry

Ezra Pound

Papini on Dante

Seán O'Casey

Censorship in the Street

Jack B. Yeats

Denis Devlin

McGreevy on Jack B. Yeats

Self

The Possessed

On Murphy (to McGreevy)

On Murphy (to Reavy)

On Works to 1951

On Endgame

On Play

On Murphy (to Sighle Kennedy)

Program note for Endgame

Part III: Words about Painters

Geer van Velde

La Peinture des van Velde (French)

Peintres de l'Empêchement (French)

Three Dialogues

Henri Hayden Homme-Peintre (French)

Hommage à Jack B. Yeats (French)

Henri Heyden

Bram van Velde

Pour Avigdor Arikha (French)

Part IV: Human Wishes

A One-Act fragment from an early historical play.

The play dramatized some episodes from the life of Samuel Johnson and takes its title from his long poem The Vanity of Human Wishes. The episodes taken dramatize Johnson's relationship with Hester Thrale, and as such, draw from her Anecdotes and Diaries rather than the traditionally more popular Life of Samuel Johnson of James Boswell. The play was abandoned after the completion of the First Act.

The only known extant fragment was given by Beckett to Ruby Cohn.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Disjecta (book)” as play by Samuel Beckett. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1983, 1937, 1951—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Disjecta, book and play can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the arts & letters register because the source frames it as play by Samuel Beckett. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5282256. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1983, 1937 and 1951.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Disjecta (book)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Disjecta (book) primary sources, Disjecta (book) archive and Disjecta research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Disjecta (book)”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Disjecta (book)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.