CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Disarmament as Humanitarian Action

research project carried out at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ5281311 ↗
Source-derived summary

Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: Making Multilateral Negotiations Work (DHA) is a research project carried out at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNIDIR). This project, launched in 2004, examines current difficulties for the international community in tackling disarmament and arms control challenges.

Research activities

The DHA project's research focuses on two major themes:

Showing how humanitarian perspectives add value to disarmament and arms control work, and how proposing new ways these approaches could assist multilateral processes;

Examining multilateral negotiating processes more broadly to help practitioners "think outside the box" in their work by drawing on interdisciplinary research.

Publications

These themes are explored in three UNIDIR publications drawing from a range of contributors in civil society, diplomacy, and the policy and research fields:

Alternative Approaches in Multilateral Decision Making: Disarmament as Humanitarian Action (2005) introduced the project and examined difficulties for multilateral practitioners in negotiating effectively in disarmament and arms control;

Disarmament as Humanitarian Action: From Perspective to Practice (2006) offered practical insights for efforts to reduce human insecurity drawing on lessons learned from humanitarian contexts such as international work on explosive remnants of war, small arms and anti-personnel mines; and

Thinking Outside the Box in Multilateral Negotiations (2006) offered new practical tools and perspectives to assist the ongoing work of multilateral disarmament practitioners.

Current work

An emphasis of the DHA project's work in 2007 is to communicate its research findings to multilateral practitioners. As one element of these efforts, the DHA project created the Disarmament Insight initiative with the Geneva Forum. This initiative is prompting constructive and creative engagement in the multilateral disarmament community through a range of activities including workshops and online resources building on the previous respective work of both DHA and the Geneva Forum.

The DHA project is supported by the Governments of Norway and the Netherlands.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Disarmament as Humanitarian Action” is research project carried out at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Disarmament, Humanitarian and Action, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 2005, 2006, 2007—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Disarmament, Humanitarian and Action is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “research project carried out at the United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5281311. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Disarmament as Humanitarian Action”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Disarmament as Humanitarian Action primary sources, Disarmament as Humanitarian Action archive and Disarmament research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Disarmament as Humanitarian Action”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Disarmament as Humanitarian Action” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.