CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay)

civil aviation authority of Paraguay

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 25, 2024
Entity authorityQ5280211 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Directorate General of Civil Aeronautics (Spanish: Dirección Nacional de Aeronáutica Civil, DINAC) is the civil aviation authority of Paraguay. Its headquarters is in the World Trade Center Asuncion in the capital city, Asunción. The Departamento de Investigacion de Accidentes de Aviacion (DIAA) of DINAC investigates aviation accidents.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay)” as civil aviation authority of Paraguay. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 48-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Directorate, National and Civil can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as civil aviation authority of Paraguay. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 25, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q5280211. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay) primary sources, Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay) archive and Directorate research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Directorate National of Civil Aeronautics (Paraguay)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.