CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Dumitru Dron

Moldovan politician

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 30, 2026
Entity authorityQ5313857 ↗
Source-derived summary

Dumitru Dron (born 30 October 1893, Cucioaia, Telenești – died 22 February 1977, Simeria, Hunedoara County, Romania) was a Bessarabian politician, a deputy in Sfatul Țării, mandate between 7 February 1918 and 27 November 1918. He was a member of the budget committee.

Biography

He served as Member of the Moldovan Parliament (1917–1918).

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Dumitru Dron” is moldovan politician. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Dumitru, Dron and Moldovan, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1893, 1977, 1918, 1917—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1893-10-30. For this dossier, Dumitru, Dron and Moldovan is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “moldovan politician” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5313857. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1893, 1977, 1918 and 1917.

Critical limits

Later biographies can compress uncertainty and repeat inherited reputations, so apparently settled claims may still require comparison. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dumitru Dron”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dumitru Dron primary sources, Dumitru Dron archive and Dumitru research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dumitru Dron”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dumitru Dron” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.