CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Dig!

2004 film by Ondi Timoner

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ3025746
Source-derived summary

Dig! is a 2004 American documentary film by Ondi Timoner.

Summary

The film explores the collision of art and commerce through the eyes of psychedelic rock groups The Dandy Warhols and The Brian Jonestown Massacre, focusing on the developing careers and the love-hate relationship of the bands' respective frontmen Courtney Taylor-Taylor and Anton Newcombe. It was shot over eight years (1996–2003) and compiled from over 2,500 hours of footage.

Cast

The Brian Jonestown Massacre

Anton Newcombe

Jeffrey Davies

Joel Gion

Matt Hollywood

Peter Hayes

Dean Taylor

The Dandy Warhols

Courtney Taylor-Taylor

Peter Holmström

Zia McCabe

Brent DeBoer

Eric Hedford

Additional cast

David LaChapelle - photographer

Genesis P-Orridge – commentator

Adam Shore – commentator

Miranda Lee Richards – musician

David Deresinski – manager

Harry Dean Stanton - actor

Reception and legacy

The film was generally very well received critically. It currently has an approval rating of 89% on review aggregator website Rotten Tomatoes, based on 70 reviews, with an average rating of 7.8/10. The website's critical consensus reads, "So you wanna be a rock 'n' roll star? Dig! compellingly chronicles the ups and downs of the Dandy Warhols and the Brian Jonestown Massacre, two ambitious bands whose love/hate relationship embodies many of the potential pratfalls of the music business." On Metacritic, the film has a weighted average score of 76 out of 100, based on 28 critics, indicating "generally favorable" reviews.

BBC Movies called it "[e]rratic, tragic, and absolutely hilarious", saying, "Dig!

Editorial summary

“Dig!” enters the record as 2004 film by Ondi Timoner. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what film, Ondi and Timoner can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2004, 1996, 2003—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2004-01-01. Its strongest next move is a source search built around film, Ondi and Timoner.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dig!” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, film, Ondi and Timoner provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3025746. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2004, 1996 and 2003.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dig!”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dig! primary sources, Dig! archive and film research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dig!”?
  2. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Dig!” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.