CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Rose Dieng-Kuntz

Senegalese computer scientist (1956–2008)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ3442370 ↗
Source-derived summary

Rose Dieng-Kuntz (March 27, 1956 – June 30, 2008) was a Senegalese computer scientist, who moved to France in 1976. She undertook significant research, becoming a major contributor to knowledge sharing and the semantic web, immediately after the availability of the World Wide Web. Winner of the Irène Joliot-Curie Prize, she was the first African woman to enroll in the celebrated French École polytechnique and her name is to be added to the Eiffel Tower.

Early life and education

Rose Sophie Fatima Dieng-Kuntz was born on March 27, 1956, in Dakar, Senegal. Raised in a family of seven children, she excelled in her studies at Van Vollenhoven High School in Dakar, where she won several first prizes in the Senegalese General Competition and in 1972 passed her baccalauréat with highest honors.

In 1976, at the age of 20, she became the first African woman admitted to the École polytechnique in France. She continued her studies at the École Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications (now Télécom Paris), where she earned an engineering degree in 1980. Dieng-Kuntz also completed a DEA (diploma of advanced studies) in computer science, followed by a PhD on the specification of parallelism at the University of Paris-Sud.

Career

Her professional career began in 1985 at INRIA (National Institute for Research in Computer Science and Control), a French national research institution focusing on computer science, control theory and applied mathematics, where her research specialisation was on the sharing of knowledge over the World Wide Web.

In 1992, she became only the second woman to lead a research project at INRIA as scientific leader of the ACACIA research unit at INRIA Sophia Antipolis, a technology park near Nice in the south of France.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Rose Dieng-Kuntz” is senegalese computer scientist (1956–2008). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Rose, Dieng-Kuntz and Senegalese, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1956, 2008, 1976, 1972—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—1956-01-01, 1956-03-27—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. For this dossier, Rose, Dieng-Kuntz and Senegalese is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “senegalese computer scientist (1956–2008)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3442370. VIAF identifies the subject as 193763421. The Library of Congress control number is n2002103635. 2 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1956, 2008, 1976 and 1972.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Rose Dieng-Kuntz”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Rose Dieng-Kuntz primary sources, Rose Dieng-Kuntz archive and Rose research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Rose Dieng-Kuntz”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Rose Dieng-Kuntz” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.