CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Balinarayan

king of the Darrang Kingdom, 1616 to 1638

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 27, 2026
Entity authorityQ120012333
Source-derived summary

Balinarayan alias Dharmanarayan or Baldeo (r. 1616– 1638) of Mughals was the son of Koch King Raghudev and younger brother of King Parikshit who was established as the first king of Darrang Desa (present-day Darrang) as a tributary by Ahom king Pratap Singha. He was the chief conductor of the operations conducted against the Mughals during their occupation of Kamrupa which was annexed to the Mughal domain after the defeat of the Koch Hajo kingdom.

Career

Background

The Mughal governor of Bengal after subduing Koch Behar, invaded Koch Hajo. In the initial conflicts the King of Hajo, Parikshit got defeated and was captured, and taken to Delhi (1613). Balinarayan, Parikshit's younger brother fled to Ahom Kingdom and took shelter there under then Ahom King Pratap Singha (r. 1601– 1641) for protection. There he convinced Pratap Singha of his honesty by paying his full obeisances.

In 1615, Mughals launched their aggression towards Ahom Kingdom, with some initial success but at last ultimately crushed and pushed back off to Barnadi . Balinarayan was established by the Pratap Singha in the Darrang region as a tributary King.

Balinarayan was called Dharmanarayan by Pratap Singha due to his religious deposition.

Conflicts with Mughals

Mughal subjugation of Koch Hajo (Kamrupa) was incomplete and the latter could only effectively control the western part.

Editorial summary

“Balinarayan” enters the record as king of the Darrang Kingdom, 1616 to 1638. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Balinarayan, king and Darrang can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1616, 1638, 1613, 1601—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Balinarayan, king and Darrang.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Balinarayan” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Balinarayan, king and Darrang provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 27, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q120012333. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1616, 1638, 1613 and 1601.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Balinarayan”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Balinarayan primary sources, Balinarayan archive and Balinarayan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Balinarayan”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Balinarayan” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.