CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Mars Design Reference Mission

conceptual design studies for crewed missions to Mars

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 7, 2026
Entity authorityQ5264292
Source-derived summary

The NASA Mars Design Reference Mission ("DRM") refer to a series of NASA conceptual design studies of the missions to send humans to Mars. The related term, Design Reference Architecture (DRA), refers to the entire sequences of missions and supporting infrastructure.

These are reference baseline studies summarizing the current technology and possible approaches for a human mission to Mars, and are not actual mission programs. According to NASA, the documents "represent a 'snapshot' of work in progress in support of planning for future human exploration of the Martian surface." The design reference missions are used for technology trade studies, to analyze the effect of different approaches to the mission.

Reference Design Mission (1993)

The first Mars Design Reference Mission was a NASA study completed in May 1993, under the auspices of the Space Exploration Initiative (SEI). The objective was to develop a "Reference Mission" based on previous studies and data, where the Reference Mission serves as a basis for comparing different approaches and criteria from future studies.

The study was based on Robert Zubrin's Mars Direct mission design. Thus dubbed Mars Semi-Direct by Zubrin, it also made several significant changes, for instance accounting for a larger crew and a dedicated Mars Ascent Vehicle that was to do an Apollo-style Mars-orbit rendezvous with the Earth Return Vehicle, which was to remain in orbit. The Design Reference Mission replaced the preceding SEI as the standing mission plan.

Approach and results

Limit the time that the crew is exposed to the harsh space environment by employing fast transits to and from Mars and abort to the surface strategy

Use local resources to reduce mission mass

Use split-mission strategy to pre-deploy mission hardware to reduce mass and minimize risk to the crew

Examine three human missions to Mars beginning in 2009

Use advanced space propulsion (e.g., nuclear thermal propulsion) for in-space transportation

Send payloads directly to Mars using a large launch vehicle (200+ t to low Earth orbit)

Use nuclear surface power for robust continuous power

The conclusions of the study were that the total mission mass was approximately 900 metric tons for the first crew (3 cargo vehicles, 1 piloted vehicle).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Mars Design Reference Mission” as conceptual design studies for crewed missions to Mars. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2009—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Mars, Design and Mission can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as conceptual design studies for crewed missions to Mars. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 7, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5264292. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1993 and 2009.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mars Design Reference Mission”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mars Design Reference Mission primary sources, Mars Design Reference Mission archive and Mars research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mars Design Reference Mission”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mars Design Reference Mission” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.