CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Amalda depressa

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ3137913
Source-derived summary

Amalda depressa, common name the depressed ancilla, is a species of a small sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusc in the family Ancillariidae.

Description

The length of the shell varies between 11 mm and 26 mm.

(Original description) The spire is shorter than in Amalda australis, and the thickened callus of the columella and spire gives greater width to the top.

Distribution

This marine species is endemic to and occurs off New Zealand.

References

Hutton, F.W. (1885). "Descriptions of new Tertiary shells - Part 2". Transactions of the New Zealand Institute. 17: 325.

Powell A W B, New Zealand Mollusca, William Collins Publishers Ltd, Auckland, New Zealand 1979 ISBN 0-00-216906-1

Michaux, B. (1991). "The Evolution of the Ancillinae with Special Reference to New Zealand Tertiary and Recent Species of Amalda H. & A. Adams, 1853 (Gastropoda:Olividae:Ancillinae)".

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Amalda depressa” is species of mollusc. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Amalda, depressa and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1885, 1979, 1991, 1853—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Amalda, depressa and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of mollusc” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3137913. The first chronological checks are 1885, 1979, 1991 and 1853.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Amalda depressa”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Amalda depressa primary sources, Amalda depressa archive and Amalda research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Amalda depressa”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Amalda depressa” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.