CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Deodápolis

municipality in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ1805488 ↗
Source-derived summary

Deodápolis is a municipality located in the Brazilian state of Mato Grosso do Sul. Its population was 12,984 (2020) and its area is 831 km2.

Editorial summary

“Deodápolis” enters the record as municipality in the state of Mato Grosso do Sul in Brazil. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Deodápolis, municipality and state can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2020—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1976-05-13. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Deodápolis, municipality and state.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Deodápolis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Deodápolis, municipality and state provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1805488. Authority coordinates are -22.276, -54.165. 3 of 3 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2020.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Deodápolis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Deodápolis primary sources, Deodápolis archive and Deodápolis research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Deodápolis”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Deodápolis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.