CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Denisa Šátralová

Czech female tennis player

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ16725789
Source-derived summary

Denisa Šátralová (née Allertová; born 7 March 1993) is a Czech former professional tennis player.

Šátralová won 10 singles and two doubles titles on the ITF Circuit in her career. On 21 March 2016, she reached her best singles ranking of world No. 55. On 1 August 2016, she peaked at No. 291 in the doubles rankings.

She reached one WTA Tour final at the 2015 Guangzhou International Women's Open, losing to Jelena Janković.

Playing for the Czech Republic Fed Cup team, she has a win–loss record of 1–0.

Personal life

Šátralová was born in Prague. In August 2019, she married her long time boyfriend Jan Šátral just outside Prague.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Denisa Šátralová” is czech female tennis player. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Denisa, Šátralová and Czech, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA productive starting point for separating a subject’s documented career from later reputation and commemoration. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1993, 2016, 2015, 2019—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1993-03-07. For this dossier, Denisa, Šátralová and Czech is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “czech female tennis player” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Biographical claims are most persuasive when dates, appointments and relationships can be traced to records created close to the events described. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16725789. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1993, 2016, 2015 and 2019.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Denisa Šátralová”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Denisa Šátralová primary sources, Denisa Šátralová archive and Denisa research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Denisa Šátralová”?
  2. Which primary records establish identity, chronology and institutional ties?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Denisa Šátralová” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.