CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Ideas and delusions of reference

belief that certain gestures, environmental cues, innocuous events, comments and so forth are directed at oneself

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ2215516
Source-derived summary

Ideas of reference and delusions of reference describe the phenomenon of an individual experiencing innocuous events or mere coincidences and believing they have strong personal significance. It is "the notion that everything one perceives in the world relates to one's own destiny", usually in a negative and hostile manner.

In psychiatry, delusions of reference form part of the diagnostic criteria for psychotic illnesses such as schizophrenia, delusional disorder, schizoaffective disorder and bipolar disorder with mania, as well as for schizotypal personality disorder. To a lesser extent, their presence can be a hallmark of paranoid personality disorder, as well as body dysmorphic disorder. They can be found in autism during periods of intense stress. They can also be caused by intoxication, such as from stimulants like methamphetamine. Psychedelics like psilocybin have also been reported to produce ideas of reference during experiences. They are also a common side effect of cannabis in which benign innocous events are believed by the experiencing individual to be personally significant, and can be caused by high-THC cannabis, especially in sensitive individuals or high doses. These experiences are part of temporary, dose-related psychotic symptoms like paranoia, delusions, and anxiety.

Examples

Persons with ideas of reference may experience:

Believing that "somehow everyone on a passing city bus is talking about them".

Editorial summary

“Ideas and delusions of reference” enters the record as belief that certain gestures, environmental cues, innocuous events, comments and so forth are directed at oneself. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Ideas, delusions and belief can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 213-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Ideas, delusions and belief.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Ideas and delusions of reference” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Ideas, delusions and belief provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2215516. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Ideas and delusions of reference”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Ideas and delusions of reference primary sources, Ideas and delusions of reference archive and Ideas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Ideas and delusions of reference”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Ideas and delusions of reference” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.