CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant

experimental gyrodyne by Sikorsky and Boeing

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ54933180
Source-derived summary

The Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant (stylized as "SB>1"; company designation S-100) was the Sikorsky Aircraft and Boeing entry for the United States Army's Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft program to replace the Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk. It is a compound helicopter with rigid coaxial rotors, powered by two Honeywell T55 turboshaft engines. It first flew on 21 March 2019.

In December 2022, the U.S. Army selected the rival Bell V-280 Valor as the winner of the Future Long-Range Assault Aircraft program. The only existing SB>1 prototype now resides in the United States Army Aviation Museum.

Development

Sikorsky Aircraft and Boeing are jointly producing a medium-lift-sized demonstrator they named SB>1 Defiant (also widely known as "SB-1") for phase one of the program. Originally planned to fly in late 2017, its first flight was delayed in April 2017 to early 2018. Sikorsky led the initial development phase one with an aircraft based on their previous Sikorsky X2 design while Boeing plans to led phase two, which is the mission systems demonstrator phase. The Boeing-Sikorsky team was seen to have an advantage with their large industrial base that may result in wider support from Congress alongside their transport helicopters being widely used by the U.S. Army.

Up to 2013, Sikorsky and partners spent $250 million on X2 and Raider with a separate team and aircraft from the S-97 Raider.

Editorial summary

“Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant” enters the record as experimental gyrodyne by Sikorsky and Boeing. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sikorsky, Boeing and SB-1 can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2019, 2022, 2017, 2018—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sikorsky, Boeing and SB-1.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sikorsky, Boeing and SB-1 provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q54933180. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 1 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2019, 2022, 2017 and 2018.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant primary sources, Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant archive and Sikorsky research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sikorsky–Boeing SB-1 Defiant” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.