Decision desk
experts projecting U.S. election winners

A decision desk is a team of experts that one or many US news organizations assemble to analyze incoming data about election results and project winners on election day. Decision desks use exit polling data as well as officially reported results as they come in, to project and then "call" the winners of elections on election night. "Projected winners" are only unofficial; depending on state or local laws, election officials may still have days or weeks after election day to complete counting votes and certifying winners.
Organizations and methodology
In the United States, three major organizations aggregate election results across the country: the Associated Press, Decision Desk HQ, and the National Election Pool. Each organization uses different methodology - the Associated Press has a team of ground reporters that receive data from state county election boards, and also gets results from data feeds of election websites, while Decision Desk HQ uses a mix of traditional phone call and fax communication with election officials, as well as an application programming interface (API) that pulls election results as they come in from county and state election websites.
According to Vox, race calls from these organizations have an accuracy of over 99%. A handful of races have been called incorrectly, requiring corrections; these include a 2018 California's 21st congressional district election, which both the Associated Press and Decision Desk HQ called incorrectly. In that race, a larger-than-expected number of late-arriving mail-in ballots was responsible for the erroneous projections.
History
United States
Exit polling data was gathered by Voter News Service which existed from 1990 to 2003, and which was disbanded due to disastrous mistakes in the 2000 presidential election and in the 2002 elections. Afterward they formed the National Election Pool, which produced skewed exit poll results in the 2004 US presidential election and in the 2016 presidential elections.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Decision desk” is experts projecting U.S. election winners. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Decision, desk and experts, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “experts projecting U.S. election winners” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Contemporary correspondence, administrative files and participant testimony can test how later narratives organized the event or institution. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q55609261. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2018, 1990, 2003 and 2000.
Official terminology may obscure informal participation, dissent or communities documented only indirectly. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.
- Event chronology
- Institutional context
- Locating named record creators
Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Decision desk”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Decision desk primary sources, Decision desk archive and Decision research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Decision desk”?
- What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
- Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Decision desk” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.