CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

Mount Kirkpatrick

mountain in Ross Dependency, Antarctica

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ1929197
Source-derived summary

Mount Kirkpatrick (84°20′S 166°25′E) is a lofty, generally ice-free mountain in Queen Alexandra Range 5 nautical miles (9.3 km; 5.8 mi) west of Mount Dickerson .

At 4,528 metres (14,856 ft) it is the highest point in the Queen Alexandra Range, Antarctica.

Exploration and name

Mount Kirkpatrick was discovered and named by the British Antarctic Expedition, 1907–1909.

It was named for a Glasgow businessman, who was one of the original supporters of the expedition.

Location

Mount Kirkpatrick is in the central Queen Alexandra Range to the south of Grindley Plateau, north of the Adams Mountains and northeast of the Marshall Mountains.

Prebble Glacier forms on its west slopes and flows west to Lennox-King Glacier.

Mount Dickerson is to its east and Decennial Peak to its south.

Martin Ridge extends southwest from Decennial Peak to the head of Berwick Glacier.

Fossil site

Mount Kirkpatrick holds one of the most important fossil sites in Antarctica, the Hanson Formation. Because Antarctica used to be warmer and supported dense conifer and cycad forest, and because all the continents were fused into a giant supercontinent called Pangaea, many ancient Antarctic wildlife share relatives elsewhere in the world.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mount Kirkpatrick” as mountain in Ross Dependency, Antarctica. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mount, Kirkpatrick and mountain.

Editorial reviewA strong orientation record where physical form, institutional use and historical geography need to be read together. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1907, 1909—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mount, Kirkpatrick and mountain providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mount Kirkpatrick”, the useful work is to connect “mountain in Ross Dependency, Antarctica” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1929197. Authority coordinates are -84.333, 166.417. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1907 and 1909.

Critical limits

Architectural summaries often privilege surviving fabric and can understate demolished phases, contested use or displaced communities. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mount Kirkpatrick”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mount Kirkpatrick primary sources, Mount Kirkpatrick archive and Mount research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mount Kirkpatrick”?
  2. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
  3. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Mount Kirkpatrick” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.