CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Fazuelos

traditional Sephardic pastry for the Jewish holiday of Purim

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ5274381
Source-derived summary

Fazuelos, also known as fijuelas, hiuelas, deblas, and hojuelas are pastries of thin fried dough. A type of rolled pastry, their origins trace back to Spain, with references dating back to the late Spanish Middle Ages.

Sephardic tradition

In Sephardic Jewish tradition, these pastries, reminiscent of Esther's megillah due to their characteristic rolled form, which recalls the shape of Haman's ears, hold cultural significance, particularly during the celebration of Purim.

Historically, fazuelos were mentioned in literature, notably in Francisco Delicado's La Lozana Andaluza, where a Jewish woman named Aldonza reminisces about preparing the pastry while living in Andalusia, fleeing persecution from the Spanish Inquisition. Fazuelos are also made by non-Jewish communities, especially during the Christian festival of Semana Santa (Holy Week), which coincides closely with Purim. This cross-cultural adoption of the pastry is documented by its inclusion in some Christian Spanish cookbooks as early as 1599.

Tunisia

Oudnin el kadhi (Tunisian Arabic: وذنين القاضي 'ears of the Judge') or wdinet el cadi (وذينات القاضي 'little ears of the judge') are a type of pastry commonly found in Tunisia.

Preparation

Writing for Tablet Magazine, food historian Hélène Jawhara Piñer provides a recipe. Comprising flour, eggs, sugar, and oil, the dough is rolled thinly, cut into strips, and briefly fried. A syrup of water, orange blossom, and sugar is then prepared for additional flavor.

Editorial summary

“Fazuelos” enters the record as traditional Sephardic pastry for the Jewish holiday of Purim. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Fazuelos, traditional and Sephardic can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1599—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Fazuelos, traditional and Sephardic.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Fazuelos” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Fazuelos, traditional and Sephardic provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5274381. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1599.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Fazuelos”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Fazuelos primary sources, Fazuelos archive and Fazuelos research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Fazuelos”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Fazuelos” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.