Deafness in Bangladesh
Open-knowledge reference entry

Deafness in Bangladesh is a major health issue. About 9.6% of the population of Bangladesh (about 13.7 million people as estimated from the 2011 census), is deaf or hard of hearing (having a loss of 40 dB or more). Hearing loss in any degree is present in 34.6% of the population (49.2 million), and profound hearing loss (a loss of 90 dB of more) is present in 1.2% of the population (1.7 million). The sign language used in Bangladesh is called Bangla Sign Language (BdSL). Deaf people in Bangladesh often do not have access to treatment or education, and commonly face discrimination. There are many Deaf associations in Bangladesh.
Causes
Most hearing loss in Bangladesh arises in adulthood, with people over 60 years of age and people of lower socio-economic status being the most likely to have significant hearing loss. Common causes of hearing loss in Bangladesh include impacted ear wax, chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM), and otitis media with effusion (OME). Congenital deafness, excessive urban noise, and the use of ototoxic drugs also contribute to the high rate of hearing loss in Bangladesh.
Bangla sign language
History
Bangla Sign Language (BdSL), also known as Bengali Sign Language or Bangladeshi Sign Language, is believed to have originated at the Calcutta Deaf and Dumb School, founded in 1893.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Deafness in Bangladesh” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Deafness, Bangladesh and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q109570990. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2011 and 1893.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Deafness in Bangladesh”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Deafness in Bangladesh primary sources, Deafness in Bangladesh archive and Deafness research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Deafness in Bangladesh”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Deafness in Bangladesh” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.