CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

David Diach

Costa Rican footballer

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 25, 2026
Entity authorityQ5232960
Source-derived summary

David Angelo Diach Madrigal (born 7 June 1974) is a Costa Rican professional footballer who currently plays for Guatemalan side Halcones.

Club career

Diach made his debut on 5 August 1995 for Costa Rican Second Division Vecinos and has played for several clubs in Costa Rica. He had spells with Trikala and Paniliakos in the Super League Greece during the 1999–2000 season, played in the second divisions in Brazil and China and for Brujas and Cartaginés whom he joined in January 2005.

He also had a brief spell with vision del 10 Luis Ángel Firpo in El Salvador where he scored 14 goals and with Antigua GFC in Guatemala.

He returned to Costa Rica, to play for Herediano until he joined Carmelita in June 2007. He joined América de Chimaltenango in Guatemala for the 2009–2010 season, but he returned to Costa Rica to play for Limón in January 2010.

In August 2013 he returned to Barrio Mexico after scoring 20 goals for fellow second division outfit Juventud Escazuceña in the 2012/13 season.

In January 2014 Diach returned to Guatemala to play for Halcones.

International career

Diach has made six appearances for the Costa Rica national football team, his debut coming in a qualifying match for the 1998 FIFA World Cup against Canada on November 16, 1997 which proved to be his sole FIFA competition match.

His final international was an October 2007 friendly match against Haiti.

Editorial summary

“David Diach” enters the record as costa Rican footballer. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what David, Diach and Costa can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1974, 1995, 1999, 2000—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1974-06-07. Its strongest next move is a source search built around David, Diach and Costa.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“David Diach” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, David, Diach and Costa provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The entry’s evidential value lies in the named roles, institutions and publications that can be tested against primary documentation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 25, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q5232960. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1974, 1995, 1999 and 2000.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “David Diach”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow David Diach primary sources, David Diach archive and David research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “David Diach”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from David Diach” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.