CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Dark fantasy

Subgenre of fantasy

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authoritySource title only
Source-derived summary

Dark fantasy is a subgenre of fantasy works that incorporates magical and supernatural elements with the grim, unsettling, and macabre atmosphere of horror fiction. The term is ambiguously used to describe stories that combine horror elements with one or another of the standard formulas of fantasy.

Editorial summary

“Dark fantasy” enters the record as subgenre of fantasy. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Dark, fantasy and Subgenre can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 46-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Dark, fantasy and Subgenre.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Dark fantasy” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Dark, fantasy and Subgenre provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Dark fantasy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Dark fantasy primary sources, Dark fantasy archive and Dark research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Dark fantasy”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Dark fantasy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.